[L2Ork-dev] GSoC'21 Proposal feedback

[Albert Graef]

Ok, makes perfect sense. I just made some further suggestions in the
document which will hopefully clarify those items.

On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 12:39 AM Gabriela Bittencourt <
gabrielabittencourt00 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm really talking about those messages (Ctrl+2).
>
> This was a suggestion of Jonathan in a previous e-mail discussion:
>
> "
>
> A few other ideas:
> * dealing with object arguments and message box content. I love the way
> DevTools will remember entire commands, even across instances. So perhaps a
> way to add previously entered box content
>
> "
>
> The idea was to expand the autocomplete to the messages also. I thought
> about storing the created messages in cache and as a new message is created
> a suggestion based on the previous ones is offered: enter to accept and tab
> to go to cycle through options. Differently of the objects drop-down, for
> the messages I pictured an inline autocomplete (as terminal tools usually
> are). Tell me if it's clearer and I can rewrite the proposal.
>
> About the objects arguments I'm not sure what to do with it: show argument
> type ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gabriela
> On 03/04/2021 23:36, Albert Graef wrote:
>
> Hi Gabriela
>
> Thanks for the proposal, looks good to me! I corrected two typos in-place,
> and I'm not sure what to make of these two items for the main weeks (this
> isn't really clear from the context to me, maybe I'm missing something
> obvious?):
>
>
>    -
>
>    Create a search index with the previously created messages;
>    -
>
>    Implement an inline autocomplete for messages (no dropdown window);
>
>
> Are you really talking about Pd messages there (those little flags,
> Ctrl+2)? If not, can you please elaborate?
>
> Thanks,
> Albert
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 11:11 PM Gabriela Bittencourt <
> gabrielabittencourt00 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello mentors,
>>
>>
>> I've just shared my proposal project "Improving workflow with
>> autocomplete feature" - I've tried to keep it short (1 page).
>>
>> Could you please review it and let me know if it's clear enough?
>>
>> Also, as I structured the project myself, with Jonathan's suggestions,
>> if you have any concerns about the approach for each task, I will be
>> happy to hear.
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much,
>>
>> Gabriela Bittencourt
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> L2Ork-dev mailing list
>> L2Ork-dev at disis.music.vt.edu
>> https://disis.music.vt.edu/listinfo/l2ork-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Albert Gr"af
> Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany
> Email: aggraef at gmail.com, web: https://agraef.github.io/
>
> _______________________________________________
> L2Ork-dev mailing list
> L2Ork-dev at disis.music.vt.edu
> https://disis.music.vt.edu/listinfo/l2ork-dev



-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany
Email: aggraef at gmail.com, web: https://agraef.github.io/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://disis.music.vt.edu/pipermail/l2ork-dev/attachments/20210404/5608aaa5/attachment-0001.html>