[L2Ork-dev] GSoC'21 Proposal feedback

[Jonathan Wilkes]

On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 8:03 PM Albert Graef <aggraef at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ok, makes perfect sense. I just made some further suggestions in the document which will hopefully clarify those items.

Also-- the same for `[expr]`, `[expr~]`, and `[fexpr]`. These are
boxes are where users tend to type a lot of complicated business.
Seeing it pop back up as an option could be a timesaver.

-Jonathan

>
> On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 12:39 AM Gabriela Bittencourt <gabrielabittencourt00 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm really talking about those messages (Ctrl+2).
>>
>> This was a suggestion of Jonathan in a previous e-mail discussion:
>>
>> "
>>
>> A few other ideas:
>>
>> * dealing with object arguments and message box content. I love the way DevTools will remember entire commands, even across instances. So perhaps a way to add previously entered box content
>>
>> "
>>
>> The idea was to expand the autocomplete to the messages also. I thought about storing the created messages in cache and as a new message is created a suggestion based on the previous ones is offered: enter to accept and tab to go to cycle through options. Differently of the objects drop-down, for the messages I pictured an inline autocomplete (as terminal tools usually are). Tell me if it's clearer and I can rewrite the proposal.
>>
>> About the objects arguments I'm not sure what to do with it: show argument type ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gabriela
>>
>> On 03/04/2021 23:36, Albert Graef wrote:
>>
>> Hi Gabriela
>>
>> Thanks for the proposal, looks good to me! I corrected two typos in-place, and I'm not sure what to make of these two items for the main weeks (this isn't really clear from the context to me, maybe I'm missing something obvious?):
>>
>> Create a search index with the previously created messages;
>>
>> Implement an inline autocomplete for messages (no dropdown window);
>>
>>
>> Are you really talking about Pd messages there (those little flags, Ctrl+2)? If not, can you please elaborate?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Albert
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 11:11 PM Gabriela Bittencourt <gabrielabittencourt00 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello mentors,
>>>
>>>
>>> I've just shared my proposal project "Improving workflow with
>>> autocomplete feature" - I've tried to keep it short (1 page).
>>>
>>> Could you please review it and let me know if it's clear enough?
>>>
>>> Also, as I structured the project myself, with Jonathan's suggestions,
>>> if you have any concerns about the approach for each task, I will be
>>> happy to hear.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you very much,
>>>
>>> Gabriela Bittencourt
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> L2Ork-dev mailing list
>>> L2Ork-dev at disis.music.vt.edu
>>> https://disis.music.vt.edu/listinfo/l2ork-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Albert Gr"af
>> Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany
>> Email: aggraef at gmail.com, web: https://agraef.github.io/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> L2Ork-dev mailing list
>> L2Ork-dev at disis.music.vt.edu
>> https://disis.music.vt.edu/listinfo/l2ork-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Albert Gr"af
> Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany
> Email: aggraef at gmail.com, web: https://agraef.github.io/
> _______________________________________________
> L2Ork-dev mailing list
> L2Ork-dev at disis.music.vt.edu
> https://disis.music.vt.edu/listinfo/l2ork-dev