[L2Ork-dev] atomic multi-step undo and pd vanilla

[Jonathan Wilkes]

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 4:41 PM Alexandre Torres Porres
<porres at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Oh, "intelligent patching*" is also one of the new additions to vanilla never mentioned in the release notes and not even documented anywhere in Pd Vanilla.
>
> It's something I have on my list to document it somewhere, but anyway, I can't live without it anymore... it'd be really nice if Purr Data also had it.
>
> so that's another something for your list ;)

I've got the list Joseph gave me and will go through and try to port
things as I can to keep up to date with Vanilla. The documented
features listed in the change log are good enough for pinning to a
particular Vanilla number. (We're already
at 0.48, but I'll use the change log to pin to future versions as we
attain parity.)

That's a workable plan and we'll deal with any other discrepancies as
they arise.

-Jonathan

>
> cheers
>
> *
> https://vimeo.com/273707442
> https://vimeo.com/279631360
> https://vimeo.com/340437816
>
> Em sex., 19 de jun. de 2020 às 17:23, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>>
>>
>> Em sex., 19 de jun. de 2020 às 17:05, Ivica Bukvic <ico at vt.edu> escreveu:
>>>
>>> IIRC Iemguis in 1.x used to long time ago not clip the values
>>
>>
>> yup, until 0.45, this changed n 0.46, but they missed doing that for nbx :(
>>
>> This is another example of compatibility flags for Pd Vanilla, you can get old behaviour with compatibility set to 0.45!
>>
>>>
>>> BTW, now that the development pace is picking up significantly, we could use additional helping hands, so if you would like to help with merging these, your contributions will be more than welcome.
>>
>>
>> As I'm no real programmer, I'd need some help on how to do that. I'm only being able to help some for Pd Vanilla cause I can use Github Desktop... and even so I usually screw up and. It's kind of embarrassing, I know :) moreover, I'm quite busy managing two quite big external libraries and also helping out with Vanilla as I can.
>>
>>>
>>> As for the values passing unchanged by the object limits, that is not something I believe is a good idea.
>>
>>
>> I hear you, not because I have an opinion about this, but because I usually think many things aren't a good idea :) but please note that this already happens for number atom boxes, so I guess the idea might have been to make this more consistent. Anyway, now if you want to clip you have to use a clip object.
>>
>> And still about being a good idea or not, I guess it's more about being compatible or not to vanilla patches and being able to run such patches as intended and worry free.
>>
>> I guess the decision is up to you and I don't mean to demand/impose anything, I just have an opinion it'd be important to provide 100% compatibility to patches written in Pd Vanilla.
>>
>> cheers
>
> _______________________________________________
> L2Ork-dev mailing list
> L2Ork-dev at disis.music.vt.edu
> https://disis.music.vt.edu/listinfo/l2ork-dev