[L2Ork-dev] purr-data side-by-side with pd-l2ork ?

[Alberto Zin]

Hello Albert, great! pd-l2ork and purr-data are now side-by-side!

Thanks again,

Alberto Zin

2017-01-08 15:04 GMT+01:00 Albert Graef <aggraef at gmail.com>:

> Fixed as of purr-data 20170108+git3228+1416566-1 (now available in the
> Xenial and Trusty PPAs). Both Pd-L2Ork and Purr Data can now be installed
> on the same system and will happily coexist. Same goes for my latest Arch
> packages in the AUR and my binary Pd-L2ork repo. Note that to make that
> work, I had to move the user config in Purr Data to ~/.purr-data (it
> previously shared the config data with Pd-L2Ork, but that isn't possible
> any more because they each have their own library path now).
>
> Also please note that I can't build Wily packages any more, Launchpad has
> all of a sudden stopped supporting it. :( Why that is isn't clear to me, as
> Vivid, which has been EOLed for much longer, is still available in the
> Launchpad menus. So if you're still running Wily, you may want to try the
> Xenial packages (not sure whether that works) or upgrade your system to
> Xenial which is an LTS and thus guaranteed to stick around much longer.
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Albert Graef <aggraef at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Alberto Zin <alberto.zin at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to try purr-data beta on linux (Mint, both 32 and 64 bits).
>>> I don't want to skrew up my l2ork install: can purr-data coexist with
>>> pd-l2ork? Or its install overwrites it?
>>>
>>
>> The available packages will all install under /usr, so it isn't possible
>> right now without some extra work. But in principle it should be possible
>> to install one of them under a different install prefix if you build the
>> package from source (using something like 'inst_dir=/opt/purr-data ./
>> tar_em_up.sh -B'). The rest would then be just setting up an appropriate
>> link to the executable and adjusting the desktop files.
>>
>> I'll see whether I can massage the purr-data debuild/PKGBUILD stuff
>> accordingly, but don't hold your breath yet. :) It would be helpful,
>> though, if you could report this as a packaging bug on the Bitbucket page
>> I've set up for the Ubuntu packages: https://bitbucket.org/l2orkubu
>> ntu/l2orkubuntu.bitbucket.org/issues
>>
>> Albert
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Albert Gr"af
>> Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany
>> Email:  aggraef at gmail.com
>> WWW:    https://plus.google.com/+AlbertGraef
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Albert Gr"af
> Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany
> Email:  aggraef at gmail.com
> WWW:    https://plus.google.com/+AlbertGraef
>
> _______________________________________________
> L2Ork-dev mailing list
> L2Ork-dev at disis.music.vt.edu
> http://disis.music.vt.edu/listinfo/l2ork-dev
>



-- 
http://sites.google.com/site/albertozin/
47 41 4d 45 20 4f 56 45 52
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://disis.music.vt.edu/pipermail/l2ork-dev/attachments/20170110/8ca7fc31/attachment.html>