[L2Ork-dev] libgsl0ldbl, ubuntustudio 16.04

[IOhannes m zmölnig]

On 06/07/2016 11:31 PM, Albert Graef wrote:
> > 
> Having both alternatives of the dev packages in the build deps should be ok
> in any case. 

oh, this is about build-deps only?
then the proper B-D should be "libgsl-dev|libgsl0-dev".
those dev-packages will then pull in the correct library packages.

> I could then rely on dh_shlibdeps picking up the proper
> runtime dep on its own.
> 
which is definitively the way to go for the dependencies of the binary
packages.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://disis.music.vt.edu/pipermail/l2ork-dev/attachments/20160609/be62c2b5/attachment.pgp>