[L2Ork-dev] Can't make a working .deb for Jessie

András Murányi muranyia at gmail.com
Mon Nov 17 16:38:58 UTC 2014


I think I made myself misunderstood.
I have a .pdlork file, not folder, in which I have some folders defined as
paths.
When I try to create an object which would use one of the abstractions from
one of those folders, it can't create. With the last version of pd-l2ork
before the newest one, I didn't have this problem.

András

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Ivica Bukvic <ico at vt.edu> wrote:

> Hi Andras,
>
> ~/.pd-l2ork folder is nor in your search path by default. I would also not
> recommend storing abstractions in there because that's really reserved only
> for your application settings. That said, if you really feel strongly about
> storing stuff in there you should add that to your path settings and you
> should be all good. We did not add that to our default path because we are
> still supporting legacy path in your home folder even though that's folder
> is not anymore being created so I didn't want to clutter path settings any
> more until we get rid of the legacy path in the first place.
>
> HTH
> Best,
>
> Ico
> On Nov 17, 2014 7:57 AM, "András Murányi" <muranyia at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Ivica Ico Bukvic <ico at vt.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/28/2014 08:36 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok, I attached my output from my last attempt to make a .deb using
>>>> ./tar_em_up.sh.
>>>>
>>>> I can't figure out why it isn't including libs like zexy, pddp, Gem.
>>>>
>>>> This is on Jessie 32-bit machine.
>>>>
>>>> -Jonathan
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report, Jonathan. It seems that when I was pulling latest
>>> version of maxlib I forgot to add new files. I am now building a new deb
>>> from the fresh git checkout to see if this fixes it. Please feel free to
>>> test on your end as well.
>>>
>>> I am also copying Andras and l2ork-dev list because he also reported a
>>> similar problem which matches your description.
>>>
>>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> and thanks. I've just got the time to test the newest l2ork;
>> I can confirm it builds and installs OK,
>> I have a new problem where it doesn't pick up abstractions from a folder
>> defined in .pdlork.
>> Is this due to the new config file structure?
>>
>> András
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://disis.music.vt.edu/pipermail/l2ork-dev/attachments/20141117/34ab3cd9/attachment.html>


More information about the L2Ork-dev mailing list