<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2017-06-14 15:56 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jancsika@yahoo.com" target="_blank">jancsika@yahoo.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div style="color:#000;background-color:#fff;font-family:Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Lucida Grande,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><div id="m_3527915671669133507m_-7400375510780695963yui_3_16_0_1_1497465999456_8204">This vote is about whether Purr Data should merge pd-cyclone with the "cyclops" binary name, or <br></div><div dir="ltr">the one from the revision with the "cyclone_ops" name.</div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I vote for cyclone_ops, to avoid the potential name collisions that Jonathan describes.<br></div></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Albert<br clear="all"></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Dr. Albert Gr"af<br>Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany<br>Email:  <a href="mailto:aggraef@gmail.com" target="_blank">aggraef@gmail.com</a><br>WWW:    <a href="https://plus.google.com/+AlbertGraef" target="_blank">https://plus.google.com/+AlbertGraef</a></div></div>
</div></div>