[L2Ork-dev] OSX version 10.8

Albert Graef aggraef at gmail.com
Wed Sep 16 08:35:22 EDT 2020

Jonathan should reply to that, but yes, I think that we need that nw.js
version for that ancient OSX version only. Personally, I think it's time
that we drop support for that version, but Jonathan has to decide that.

As an aside, does that mean that the runners are back online again? I have
one pending merge request where all the runners failed, I'd like to just
start that pipeline again, is it ok to do so?

Best, and thanks for your work on the CI!

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 2:24 PM Sam Thursfield <samthursfield at pm.me> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I just noticed that when I rewrote the .gitlab-ci.yml file, I accidentally
> removed the `osx_version=10.8` flag from the tar_em_up.sh invocation. This
> means the CI pulls nw.js v0.24.4 instead of v0.14.7 for the Mac OS tests
> since
> https://git.purrdata.net/jwilkes/purr-data/-/commit/4bffb36f92ff3b3ee67cde7cb2d3fc055efff2b6
> I'm guessing the correct thing is to restore that flag, but since nobody
> seems to have noticed yet -- is it needed? Was this because newer versions
> of nw.js drop support for OSX 10.8?
> Sam
> _______________________________________________
> L2Ork-dev mailing list
> L2Ork-dev at disis.music.vt.edu
> https://disis.music.vt.edu/listinfo/l2ork-dev

Dr. Albert Gr"af
Computer Music Research Group, JGU Mainz, Germany
Email: aggraef at gmail.com, web: https://agraef.github.io/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://disis.music.vt.edu/pipermail/l2ork-dev/attachments/20200916/be7e90ba/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the L2Ork-dev mailing list