[L2Ork-dev] new alpha release of pd-l2ork

[Ivica Bukvic]

Definitely!

Best,

Ico

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Liam Goodacre <liamg_uw at hotmail.com> wrote:

> No, I'm on 20160530. Would that account for the difference?
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:00:15 -0400
> From: ico at vt.edu
> To: l2ork-dev at disis.music.vt.edu
> Subject: Re: [L2Ork-dev] new alpha release of pd-l2ork
>
> Hmm, I just tried the clone help patch and added loadbang to print each
> instance with a loadbang and it works fine here. Are you sure you're using
> the latest version (20160531)? I re-uploaded it sometime late yesterday
> evening.
>
> Best,
>
> Ico
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Liam Goodacre <liamg_uw at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Here's something else I spotted--[loadbang] doesn't seem to be working
> inside [clone]. This doesn't happen in Vanilla, so I assume it's an L2ork
> problem. [initbang] works fine.
>
> _______________________________________________
> L2Ork-dev mailing list
> L2Ork-dev at disis.music.vt.edu
> http://disis.music.vt.edu/listinfo/l2ork-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ L2Ork-dev mailing list
> L2Ork-dev at disis.music.vt.edu http://disis.music.vt.edu/listinfo/l2ork-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> L2Ork-dev mailing list
> L2Ork-dev at disis.music.vt.edu
> http://disis.music.vt.edu/listinfo/l2ork-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://disis.music.vt.edu/pipermail/l2ork-dev/attachments/20160601/2cb12931/attachment.html>