[L2Ork-dev] [PD] pd-l2ork 20121115 rc1 now available including deb -- please test and provide feedback

[Jonathan Wilkes]

Sounds good, I'll try again with the git version...

-Jonathan



----- Original Message -----
> From: Ivica Ico Bukvic <ico at vt.edu>
> To: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com>
> Cc: "An open mailing list for a world-wide network of aspiring L2Orkists, L2Ork developers, contributors, and supporters." <l2ork-dev at disis.music.vt.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 6:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD] pd-l2ork 20121115 rc1 now available including deb -- please test and provide feedback
> 
>T his was fixed in the latest control file on git. I by mistake (read: 
> lack of experience with debs) did not vet the control file. All should 
> be well now.
> 
> On 12/06/2012 05:32 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>>  Ok, turns out I just needs the devscripts and now it builds the deb 
> correctly.
>> 
>>  Debian Wheezy can't satisfy libglew1.5 because it has libglew1.6.  I 
> just changed the
>>  DEPENDS stuff in order to get past that.
>> 
>>  It installed successfully using Gdebi Package Manager and runs 
> successfully.
>> 
>> 
>>  But after the successful installation it shows this error in red:
>>  Error: Breaks existing package 'pd-l2ork'
>>  conflict pd-l2ork ()
>> 
>> 
>>  I don't have another pd-l2ork deb package that I can find, either in 
> that directory
>>  or searching the repositories.
>> 
>>  -Jonathan
>> 
>> 
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>  From: Ivica Ico Bukvic <ico at vt.edu>
>>>  To: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com>
>>>  Cc: "An open mailing list for a world-wide network of aspiring 
> L2Orkists, L2Ork developers, contributors, and supporters." 
> <l2ork-dev at disis.music.vt.edu>
>>>  Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 1:04 AM
>>>  Subject: Re: [PD] pd-l2ork 20121115 rc1 now available including deb -- 
> please test and provide feedback
>>> 
>>>  Your architecture descriptor in the control file is empty, which 
> suggests Debian
>>>  either has a fundamentally different version of dpkg-architecture 
> (unlikely) or
>>>  you don't have this tool installed (it might be that Debian has it 
> as part
>>>  of a separate optional package that has to be installed independently 
> from other
>>>  deb building tools).
>>> 
>>>  The following is command that is used by Makefile to detect your 
> architecture
>>>  and populate this field:
>>> 
>>>  dpkg-architecture
>>> 
>>>  Run it first by itself and see if you even have it. The output should 
> be
>>>  something like:
>>> 
>>>  DEB_BUILD_ARCH=amd64
>>>  DEB_BUILD_ARCH_OS=linux
>>>  DEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU=amd64
>>>  DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS=64
>>>  DEB_BUILD_ARCH_ENDIAN=little
>>>  DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU=x86_64
>>>  DEB_BUILD_GNU_SYSTEM=linux-gnu
>>>  DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE=x86_64-linux-gnu
>>>  DEB_BUILD_MULTIARCH=x86_64-linux-gnu
>>>  DEB_HOST_ARCH=amd64
>>>  DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS=linux
>>>  DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU=amd64
>>>  DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS=64
>>>  DEB_HOST_ARCH_ENDIAN=little
>>>  DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU=x86_64
>>>  DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM=linux-gnu
>>>  DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE=x86_64-linux-gnu
>>>  DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH=x86_64-linux-gnu
>>> 
>>>  If that goes well, try the actual command ran by Makefile:
>>> 
>>>  dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH
>>> 
>>>  The output should be your architecture, in my case:
>>> 
>>>  amd64
>>> 
>>>  Naturally, if you don't have the tool, install it.  When trying to 
> rebuild
>>>  the deb you can use lowercase -b option which is an incremental install
>>>  (provided your immediate previous attempt was to build a deb rather 
> than a
>>>  script-based installer) that completes a lot quicker.
>>> 
>>>  Hope this helps!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  On 11/29/2012 02:16 AM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>>>>>    ________________________________
>>>>>    From: Ivica Bukvic <ico at vt.edu>
>>>>>    To: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com>
>>>>>    Cc: "An open mailing list for a world-wide network of 
> aspiring
>>>  L2Orkists, L2Ork developers, contributors, and supporters."
>>>  <l2ork-dev at disis.music.vt.edu>
>>>>>    Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 11:51 PM
>>>>>    Subject: Re: [PD] pd-l2ork 20121115 rc1 now available 
> including deb --
>>>  please test and provide feedback
>>>>> 
>>>>>    Also if you can, please send me the entire output of the 
> terminal
>>>  during build? Don't forget to compress it. If it proves too large 
> for
>>>  emailing, can you post it in a dropbox?
>>>>>    Thanks!
>>>>    Here is the control.  How do I capture the terminal output?
>>>> 
>>>>    -Jonathan
>>> 
>>>  -- Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A
>>>  Composition, Music Technology
>>>  Director, DISIS Interactive Sound & Intermedia Studio
>>>  Director, L2Ork Linux Laptop Orchestra
>>>  Head, ICAT IMPACT Studio
>>>  Virginia Tech
>>>  Department of Music
>>>  Blacksburg, VA 24061-0240
>>>  (540) 231-6139
>>>  (540) 231-5034 (fax)
>>>  disis.music.vt.edu
>>>  l2ork.music.vt.edu
>>>  ico.bukvic.net
>>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A
> Composition, Music Technology
> Director, DISIS Interactive Sound & Intermedia Studio
> Director, L2Ork Linux Laptop Orchestra
> Head, ICAT IMPACT Studio
> Virginia Tech
> Department of Music
> Blacksburg, VA 24061-0240
> (540) 231-6139
> (540) 231-5034 (fax)
> disis.music.vt.edu
> l2ork.music.vt.edu
> ico.bukvic.net
>